According to a separate order of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, military unit commanders issue orders requiring the formation of lists of military lawyers.

One such order was received by the civic initiative ”Holka“ from sources in the Ministry of Defense.

The orders are based on the law “On the Bar and Practice of Law,” which indeed prohibits combining military service and practice of law.

But why did they take up the case only now, in the third year of the great war?

The text of the order according to the order of the Commander-in-Chief of May 10, 2024, on the formation of lists of lawyers in the Armed Forces of Ukraine

“To explain to servicemen who have the status of an advocate the provisions of Article 7 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Bar and Practice of Law”. The status of a lawyer is incompatible with military service… to warn servicemen who have the status of a lawyer that the military unit will initiate before the relevant regional bar councils the issue of bringing to disciplinary responsibility, in case of non-compliance with the requirements of Article 7 of the law…, other measures of disciplinary influence,” the order says, the deadline for which is to be reported by May 24.

The head of the board of the Zmina Human Rights Center, Tetyana Pechonchyk, suggests that the case was intensified at the request of the National Bar Association of Ukraine:

How does the Association act?
Tetyana Pechonchyk
Tetyana Pechonchyk
Head of the Board of the Zmina Human Rights Center
This association has been headed by Medvedchuk's associate Lidia Izovitova for over 10 years. This is not the first time the Association has put pressure on lawyers who went to defend Ukraine. It is worth mentioning here that in cases where some lawyers who remained in the temporarily occupied territories are involved in torture, they are not disbarred, but instead are sought out by the Armed Forces. And now they are also trying to make sure that military units initiate prosecutions.

Earlier this year, MPs Anatoliy Tkachenko (Servant of the People) and Antonina Slavytska (Restoration of Ukraine) introduced a bill that would allow for the possibility of combining military service and legal practice. It was criticized by committee member Volodymyr Vatras (Servant of the People). So far, this initiative has not been considered by the committee.

Mykhailo Zhernakov, Chairman of the Board of the Dejure Foundation, suggests that the Committee on Legal Policy, headed by Denys Maslov of the Servant party, should develop amendments to the Law on the Bar, which currently allows a monopoly in this area:

What would the changes in legislation do?
Mykhailo Zhernakov
Mykhailo Zhernakov
Chairman of the Board, Dejure Foundation
These changes would help us get rid of the enemy's allies in the bar and bring order to it. This would strengthen judicial reform. The need to reform the bar, I recall, is stated in the European Commission's report. Instead, a member of the Servant Committee, Volodymyr Vatras, is registering a draft law (11279) that allows the prosecution of journalists who associate a lawyer with his or her client. Our partners did not put forward such a demand. Yes, a lawyer should not always be associated with a client. However, some cases are very revealing and the public should know about them. In particular, the lawyer Oleksiy Shevchuk, who is the speaker of the Association, defended anti-Ukrainian figures, for example, the traitor, the late Ilya Kiva.

The current speaker of the Bar Association Shevchuk next to the late traitor Kiva

The legislative initiative, which, if adopted, could fine journalists who associate a lawyer with his or her client (11279), appeared in May. In fact, two months after the Ukrainian National Bar Association published its open appeal on “violation of media guarantees of the legal profession”. Thus, the requirements of the Association are being fulfilled by the Legal Policy Committee quite quickly.

On May 22, the UNBA website published information that “the Verkhovna Rada supported” the UNBA initiative. However, it was not a matter of the parliament supporting this initiative, but only of the submission of a draft law by several MPs.

By the way, one of the co-authors of the initiative lobbied by the Association is Oleksandr Puzanov, MP elected from the OPFL. He is a member of the so-called “Monaco battalion”. As the leader of the Kyiv branch of the now-banned Opposition Bloc party, he had previously stated:

What did the MP propose?
Oleksandr Puzanov
Oleksandr Puzanov
MP elected from the Opposition Bloc
From the position of the Opposition Bloc, negotiations should be conducted with absolutely any subject if these negotiations will bring the long-awaited peace. It should not make a difference whether it is militants, separatists, or any other entity.

As for the current leadership of the Bar Association, which is lobbying for these legislative changes, it has been actively contacting its Russian counterparts during the occupation of Crimea and Donbas. In this photo, the head of the Association, Izovitova, is seen next to Yuriy Pylypenko, a representative of the Moscow Region Bar Association.

Screenshot from the website of the Bar Association

Pylypenko appears on one of the lists of “Accomplices of the occupation authorities” created by the International Anti-Corruption Foundation (an organization of Navalny’s supporters). He “actively supported Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. He assisted the occupation administration in Zaporizhzhia region to integrate this territory into Russia – this is the reason given opposite the name of the lawyer with whom Izovitova was photographed.

Lawyer Artem Donets, who went to the front and has repeatedly reported harassment by the Association, emphasizes: “Izovitova has been the head of the Association for more than 10 years and her term of office expired in 2022. Even under this Yanukovych-era law, there should be elections for the leadership.

Why are defense lawyers being removed?
Artem Donets
Artem Donets
A lawyer who went to the frontline
Why is the bar now being purged of the most patriotic - those who went to defend the country? It is because lawyers will be electing this leadership. Defense lawyers are simply eliminated in this way. Veterans will not be able to be elected to this Association for the same reasons. The fewer patriotic lawyers there are, the more chances the “cotton wool” lawyers have to elect the “cotton wool” again. And the bar should provide human resources for the prosecutor's office and the courts. This is how judicial reform is being blocked. It's a shame that Medvedchuk's associates found a way to solve the issue of disciplining lawyers who went to the front through the Defense Ministry and the Armed Forces. And here we have a question for the relevant committee of the Verkhovna Rada, which has not amended the law since January to allow for the combination of service and lawyer's activities. For some reason, some MPs are ready to fulfill the whims of the unauthorized former heads of the Association very quickly.

As a reminder, the Constitutional Court is currently considering a complaint filed by lawyer Viacheslav Pleskach. This complaint concerns the “serfdom” in the bar, which was enshrined in law during the Yanukovych era. Any lawyer has to be a member of the National Bar Association of Ukraine and pay dues. Anyone who is not a member of the association has no right to practice law.

Special for “Glavcom”

Medvedchuk has appealed: he wants to resume his legal practice in Ukraine

Viktor Medvedchuk, accused of state treason, disagreed with the decision of the Kyiv District Administrative Court, which denied him the restoration of his certificate to practice law. He appealed this decision.